DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480
BC
Docket No: 07923-13
9 January 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title LO of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 January 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in. accordance: with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 30 March 2004. On 10 April 2006,
you received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for being in an
unauthorized absence (UA) status and missing your ship's
movement. You completed your obligated service honorably;
however, aS you were never promoted above pay grade of E-3, and
were released from active duty in that pay grade on 28 March
2008. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-3R, as required by
governing directives.
The Board found that RE-3R is the most favorable reentry code
authorized when a Sailor is discharged at the expiration of his
term of active obligated service and has failed to meet
professional growth criteria as in your case. The alternative
code is RE-4. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
—————
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8209 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that RE-3R is the most favorable reentry code authorized when a Sailor is discharged at the expiration of his term of active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0193 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material subniitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that RE- 3R is the most favorable reentry ‘code authorized when a Sailor is discharged at the expiration of his term of active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06569-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 April 2004, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3, and assigned a reentry code of RE-3R.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01181-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 June 1993, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03837-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ~ application on 26 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is authorized when an individual is discharged at the expiration of his term of active obligated service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06050-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07934-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 28 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on proceedi ngs of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment or who are not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11228-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01799-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2011. At the completion of your required active duty, you were released to the Navy Reserve with an honorable characterization of service, not recommended for retention, and were assigned an RE-3R (failure to meet professional growth criteria) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12763-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.